Fakulteta za matematiko, naravoslovje in informacijske tehnologije / UNI

Njegov pravi naziv bi moral biti raziskovalec in ne profesor. In če si raziskovalec še ne bi smelo pomeniti da si lahko tudi profesor! On je pač izjemno pameten, nadarjen za svoje področje. Svoje znanje stresa iz rokava za šalo, ampak po drugi strani ima zelo malo če sploh kaj občutka za poučevanje, občutka za socialnost, občutka za delo z ljudmi na koncu koncev. On pač ne more razumeti da študentom pač matematika ni tako lahko razumljiva kot pač njemu. Pogosto te pa tudi prestraši z dejstvom da če tega ne boš znal da ti sledi naslednji rok.

I have quite a lot experiences with prof. Shortly said; I heard many students that he is one of the best mentors for final thesis. But when it comes to his subjects; it is good but nothing more... It should be better. Most of the time I was happy and had positive opinion about him but at the critical moments you probably just won't love him any more. Reasons why are obvious.

From my point of view, he is one of the most underrated professors at our faculty! Right from the first lectures he provides a fully organised script through the e-classroom – honestly, no one else does this at such a high level. During lectures, he is simply a genuinely kind person: polite, clear in his explanations, and consistently well-organised. He always replies to emails incredibly fast, and his explanations are so detailed that it’s almost impossible not to understand the material. And finally, when it comes to grading, he is objective and fair – something that, unfortunately, isn’t always the case with all professors. If you take the time to go through the material and exercises, you’re almost guaranteed to pass on the first exam, or at worst on the second.